<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Spacex - Tag - Lee Wynne</title><link>https://leewynne.com/tags/spacex/</link><description>Spacex - Tag - Lee Wynne</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://leewynne.com/tags/spacex/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The SpaceX Engine That Produces Less Thrust Than a Coin Pressing on Your Palm</title><link>https://leewynne.com/posts/spacex-engine-less-thrust-than-coin/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:03:00 +0000</pubDate><author>Lee Wynne</author><guid>https://leewynne.com/posts/spacex-engine-less-thrust-than-coin/</guid><description><![CDATA[<div class="featured-image">
                <img src="/images/posts/spacex-propulsion.jpg" referrerpolicy="no-referrer">
            </div><p>The @SpaceX Propulsion Story Nobody Is Talking About..</p>
<p>SpaceX operates two fundamentally different propulsion philosophies across its fleet and most fans don&rsquo;t fully appreciate just how wild the engineering gap between them is.</p>
<p>On one side, you have Dragon&rsquo;s Draco engines: sixteen fire-breathing chemical thrusters that ignite on contact and punch the capsule around low Earth orbit with brute force. On the other, you have over 7,000 Starlink satellites, each gliding through space on a whisper of ionized gas, producing less thrust than the weight of a coin and somehow, that&rsquo;s enough.</p>]]></description></item></channel></rss>